Fraud victims lose £28K to bank transfer scams every hour

9th March 2022

Victims are losing more to bank transfer scams every hour than the average UK worker earns a year, new research from Which? has revealed.

A voluntary reimbursement code on bank transfer scams, also known as authorised push payment fraud (APP), was introduced in May 2019, and most major banks have signed up. It instructs them to not only reimburse all customers who are not at fault, but also provide them with adequate support.

However, Which?’s analysis of UK Finance figures show that between July 2019 and the end of June 2021 a total of £854 million was lost across 306,573 cases of APP fraud, and only 42 per cent of losses was returned to the customer.

As a result, £495 million has not been reimbursed, meaning customers have been left to shoulder net losses at a rate of £4.7 million a week, £676,881 a day or £28,203 a hour. This means that victims have lost more to bank transfer fraud every hour than the average UK employee earns in a year (£25,971).

It is now almost three years since the reimbursement code, which banks helped to design, came into force, but the large numbers of scams still taking place and the huge sums of money being lost highlight how systemic issues with protections for this type of crime remain.

The current reimbursement lottery leaves many victims facing an uphill struggle to recover their money, as the code has been applied inconsistently and often wrongly by many firms. The regulator has stated there are significant issues with the code, and Which? has heard from countless victims who claim they have been unfairly treated by their bank.

In one example, a Santander customer in his 80s was left more than £3,600 out of pocket after falling victim to an impersonation scam on WhatsApp. The scammer posed as his son on the messaging service before tricking the victim into transferring money to an account to supposedly help pay for a bill.

The bank initially refused to make any reimbursement after weeks of investigating the case, despite the sophistication of the scam and the victim’s age. It was only after Which? helped the victim write a complaint letter that the bank agreed to give a full refund.

Which? has seen a rise in WhatsApp scams, also known as the ‘mum and dad scam’, where fraudsters pose as family members in order to manipulate victims into transferring money. Which? found that one in five social media scams reported to its scam sharer tool between March 2021 and January 2022 involved WhatsApp.

Since Which? launched its super-complaint back in 2016, the consumer champion has been calling for the regulator and the banks to introduce a fair system of reimbursement for victims of bank transfer scams.

However, losses from APP fraud have risen year on year, and despite a voluntary approach providing an increased level of protection for some consumers, the regulator has admitted that reimbursement levels have been significantly lower than it expected.

The Lending Standards Board and Financial Ombudsman Service have also repeatedly found issues with inconsistent and unfair treatment of victims, and the government has needed to intervene.

While the government’s commitment to legislate for mandatory reimbursement of victims is positive, the situation for consumers will not improve unless changes are brought in swiftly, and it is clearer when firms should refund victims. Which? believes that a reimbursement obligation should be placed on payment providers, with clear liability rules set out in legislation.

The consumer champion is also calling on the Payment Systems Regulator to ensure it is ready to act the moment that legislation is passed and set out a clear direction for how it will finally reduce the financial harm suffered by victims.

Rocio Concha, Which? Director of Policy and Advocacy, said “Despite huge sums being lost to bank transfer scams on an hourly basis, low reimbursement rates based on inconsistent and unfair decisions by banks demonstrate how the voluntary code isn’t providing the safeguards promised to victims.”

“While commitments to make reimbursement mandatory were a huge win for consumers, it’s vital that the government introduces the right legislation that will ensure victims get fair and consistent treatment.”

“The regulator must also ensure it is ready to introduce and enforce mandatory reimbursement rules the moment that this legislation is passed.”

Emma Lovell, Chief Executive, at the Lending Standard Board said “While scam prevention importantly remains at the top of the agenda for the financial services sector, scams don’t occur at the point of payment. The social engineering so often used, together with the evolving sophistication of scams, are convincing enough to make a payment, and the circumstance in which it comes about, appear genuine. By point-of-payment the customer has committed.”

“There are multiple organisations involved in this customer journey, meaning there are multiple opportunities to save that person from financial and emotional harm. Other sectors must now come together with financial services providers and understand where the ‘danger spots’ lie within the customer journey, so that each organisation can take responsibility for intervention at the right point.”

“APP scams cause significant financial and emotional distress, with the victim’s experience so often associated with feelings of guilt, shame, worry, and embarrassment. The Contingent Reimbursement Model Code (CRM Code) overseen by the LSB, is currently the only set of protections in place for consumers to detect, prevent and respond to APP scams. Reimbursement alone, although vital in reducing financial harm, cannot expunge the feelings of distress and shame that these scams cause. Clearly it would be better if we could prevent these distressing scams from happening in the first place. Signatory firms continue to work on detection and prevention measures for their customers, and we urge other financial service providers to sign up to the Code and do the same.”

“Cross sector collaboration is key to making scam prevention a reality and avoiding the devastating impact to customers. We stand ready to continue working with the industry to ensure better customer outcomes. An investigation by consumer group Which? has found banks are returning less than half the amount of cash stolen from victims of transfer fraud.”

Helen Morrissey, Senior Pensions and Retirement Analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown said “This data shows the terrible human cost of scam activities with over £28,000 lost per hour – more than the average person earns in a year – in just one type of fraud. It is traumatic enough being tricked out of your hard-earned money but then to find you will not be reimbursed is a dreadful situation that can have long-lasting impacts on people’s financial resilience. The government must move quickly on its commitment to mandatory reimbursement.”

“Scammers are real shape shifters and are ready to change their tactics depending on the situation. There is no part of your finances that are safe from them whether it be savings, investments or your pension. It is vital to remain vigilant.”